Last year I reviewed the Clinton Administration's Internet presence (April 1994 _DATABASE_). Now it is time to take a closer look at another branch of the U.S. government--the legislative branch. Some members of Congress, both the House and the Senate, have e-mail addresses. Some have their own gopher or Web space, and campaigns are discovering the communication potential of the Net. However, law-making is the primary business of Congress, and it is the availability of federal legislation and bill tracking systems that makes the Congressional resources such a substantial network resource. MAJOR SITES Various segments of the government have created Internet access points to Congressional information. The three major sites for legislative information are the House of Rep-resentatives, the Library of Congress and the Government Printing Office. The House Web server (http://www.house.gov) was brought online in early 1995. Many of the options point back to the older (in Net terms) House gopher (gopher://gopher.house.gov). Both the gopher and the Web offer similar resources: maps for visitors, information about the internal workings of the House, educational resources and more. On both, the legislative information is easily available and not buried deep in the menu or hypertext structure. Both the Web and gopher present an interface for searching each of the two principal legislative House WAIS server databases: the full text of House bills and the bill status system for House and Senate bills. The Senate also has a gopher, at gopher.senate.gov, and by the time this column is published, the Web server at http://www.senate.gov may be up and running on a regular basis. However, while the Senate offers information space for individual senators and their documents, it does not offer the level of information about legislation available elsewhere. The Library of Congress offers a number of different databases of legislative information. The "Federal Legislation" menu option in the LC Information System (telnet://locis.loc.gov) includes both descriptions and status of legislation. The available databases go much farther back than any of the other Net resources, to 1973. However, the only full text available on LOCIS is for a very few, selected bills that have been passed into law. A newer WWW offering from the Library of Congress is "THOMAS: Legislative Information on the Internet" at http://thomas.loc.gov. In early development stages, THOMAS already provides the full text of bills from both chambers. The full text of the legislation is accessible by keyword and bill number. THOMAS does not have any bill status system and the link to the _Congressional Record_ is not yet functional, but other additions are being planned. According to the THOMAS Home Page, "Future enhancements to THOMAS will include adding the Library's Bill Digest files, summaries and chronologies of legislation, and will integrate them with the full text of bills." The Government Printing Office (GPO) is the official source for the full text of legislation. The House gopher and WWW obtain their electronic copies of the bills from the GPO. Therefore, it is not surprising that the GPO also is a source for legislation. Through the GPO Access program, which uses WAIS for indexing and access, the GPO offers a number of legislative databases, including the full text of bills from the 103rd and the 104th Congress, the Congressional Record full text for 1994 and 1995, and the History of Bills for the 103rd and the 104th Congress. GPO Access is both a commercial and a free program. Different prices are available, depending on which databases are chosen, starting at $35/month for a single user of the bills databases. GPO Access is also available for free at some depository libraries, and a few of those offer open Internet access. The easiest of these to reach are Louisiana State University and Georgia Southern University. Telnet to indigo.lib.lsu.edu and log in as gpo; or telnet to gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu, log in as info and choose GPO Access from the menu. Other depository libraries are considering the possibility of offering the same service, and most of these use Simple WAIS (swais) as seen in Figure 1. For a complete list of GPO Access sites, use gopher to connect to marvel.loc.gov, and then follow these menus: Government Information/ Federal Information Resources/ Information By Branch of Federal Government/ General Information Resources/ Government Printing Office (GPO)/ GPO Access (through Depository Library Sites)/ This listing can also be found by WWW at a rather lengthy URL, but it does not work as well. The gopher-to-URL transformation gets confused and the list of sites must to be deduced from the badly formed URLs. FULL TEXT FOR BILLS One prominent feature of the many Internet resources for legislative information is the full text, ASCII versions of introduced legislation. Both THOMAS and the House gopher have full text for bills from the 104th Congress. However, the House servers only include the full text for House bills and resolutions. THOMAS includes the bills and resolutions from the Senate, and it also includes bills from the 103rd Congress. GPO Access includes bills from both chambers from both the 104th and the 103rd sessions. Which of the three is the most up-to-date? In timeliness, both the House servers and THOMAS lag behind GPO Access. During the time that I compared the different services, GPO Access was two days more current than either of the other sources. In addition, H.R. 723 was available on GPO Access while it was missing from THOMAS and the House gopher even weeks after the bill was introduced. Yet for ease of use, there is no clear winner. On both the House gopher and Web home page, the full-text bill option presents a single prompt for search terms. Boolean searching is available, as it is on GPO Access, but the Boolean operators must be in uppercase. The only operators are AND, OR, NOT and ADJ. If the operator is accidentally entered as lowercase, the operator is ignored as a stopword and the default operator, which is an OR, is used. On the House sites and on GPO Access, the WAIS search engine's default limit is 40 hits, and the results are ranked in order based on the WAIS algorithms. THOMAS uses a slightly different search engine developed by INQUERY but the results are still very similar to WAIS. The Web form (Figure 2) presents a more intuitive front end than the single-line WAIS query. The first form is used for keyword searching, with a pull-down menu option for choosing between the 103rd and the 104th Congress. Radio buttons are available for choosing all bills, just those for which there has been floor action, or only enrolled bills. Unfor-tunately, keyword searching is limited to the Boolean OR, which is the de-fault. THOMAS also limits retrieval to the first 100 hits. The THOMAS help files acknowledge the non-Boolean limitations and the lack of a controlled vocabulary. Boolean capabilities are being planned, and the help file suggests using the Federal Legislation option within LOCIS for controlled vocabulary searching. The standard Boolean capabilities of the LOCIS database are a welcome relief from the strange ways of WAIS. Combined with the Library's indexing of bills, LOCIS presents a more traditional option for searching for legislation. Unfortunately, LOCIS does not contain the full-text versions of the vast majority of bills. So, LC suggests that you search LOCIS for specific bills and then, once you have the bill numbers, go back to THOMAS to retrieve the full text. THOMAS is the best option for finding a specific bill number. The House gopher and GPO Access can also pull up a specific bill, but the rather unwieldy adjacency operator must be used. For example, to retrieve H.R. 789, the WAIS needs to see a search such as h ADJ r ADJ 789. THOMAS uses a form for searching by bill number, and the search statement is much more intuitive. The same search on THOMAS is hr 789 and retrieves all versions of the bill, including amendments. GPO Access also gives the various versions of bills but they are labeled only with codes. Thus, a bill that has been considered and passed by the Senate is labeled with (cps) on GPO Access, while on THOMAS the bill is marked as "Considered and passed by the Senate." THOMAS is also the only option for browsing through bills by bill number. Under the "list of bills by type" option, users first choose from the following list: House Bills House Concurrent Resolutions House Joint Resolutions House Resolutions Senate Bills Senate Concurrent Resolutions Senate Resolutions Senate Joint Resolutions After you choose the kind of bill or resolution, THOMAS presents the requested legislation in straight numeric order. This section could be even more useful if it provided an easy way to jump to the higher numbers. Instead, THOMAS presents 100 bill titles at a time and the only navigation button is for moving on to the next 100 titles. One nongovernmental Web site that shows some potential for a more elegant interface to the various bill search engines goes by the name of Will T. Bill (http://www.unipress.com/will-t-bill.html). Will T. Bill is simply a World-Wide Web forms interface to the House WAIS server. It provides a fill-in-the-blank front end, with options for bill number, title, date, sponsor and key phrases. TRACKING LEGISLATION To follow a bill from its introduction to its possible passage into law, the House Web site (and gopher) is the most current and comprehensive source for legislation tracking. THOMAS has no bill status system (yet). The databases on GPO Access include a History of Bills derived from the _Congressional Record Index_ but it is not very current. The Federal Legislation database on LOCIS covers some chronology of legislation, but it is neither as current nor as comprehensive as the House database. LOCIS includes floor, committee and subcommittee actions. While it is worth checking as a backup source, the House WAIS database for bill status should be the first choice. The House's bill status database includes information about legislation from both houses, while the full-text House database only includes House bills. While it is understandable that the House would leave it up to the Senate to load their own bills, it presents unnecessary difficulties for the user. The bill status database solves that problem and simply includes the status of legislation irregardless of origin. There is even a separate database for the most recent legislative day's bill status, making this a very current source. As with the full-text bills WAIS database, Boolean search queries require operators in uppercase. In addition to actions on a bill, the House database includes references to the _Congressional Record_, report numbers, amendments and related legislation. Figure 3 shows a brief example of a status report for a piece of legislation that has been passed and signed into law. WHERE TO TURN FIRST In a few short years, the amount of Internet-accessible information about the current legislative process in Washington has grown significantly. Washington watchers on the Net can now easily browse the full text of bills and follow their progression through the legislative process. All of the services discussed are, like practically everything on the Internet, still under development, and each will likely see significant improvements in the next few years. In the meantime, choosing the first database to search depends on the specific need. LOCIS provides Boolean searching and controlled vocabulary indexing of legislation. THOMAS offers easy access by bill number and the full text of House and Senate bills. But GPO Access presents the most up-to-date source for full-text bills. And for bill status, the House home page (or gopher) is the best choice. SIDEBAR: Featured Sites U.S. House of Representatives Home Page http://www.house.gov U.S. House of Representatives Gopher gopher://gopher.house.gov Library of Congress Information System (LOCIS) telnet or tn3270 to locis.loc.gov, then choose "Federal Legislation" THOMAS http://thomas.loc.gov GPO Access at Georgia Southern University telnet://info@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu GPO Access at Louisiana State University telnet://gpo@indigo.lib.lsu.edu Will T. Bill http://www.unipress.com/will-t-bill.html
Communications to the author should be addressed to Greg R. Notess, Montana State University Libraries, Bozeman, MT 59717-0332; 406/994-6563; Internet--greg@notess.com ; http://www.notess.com..
Copyright © 1995, Online Inc. All rights reserved.